La Vie En Rose review

 Number 603 on the top 1000 films of all time is the musical biopic La Vie En Rose.

This French film tells the story of famed singer Edith Piaf, otherwise known as the Little Sparrow. Marion Cotillard stars as Piaf. From her impoverished childhood to her untimely death, we see the rise and fall of France's national chanteuse. 

I didn't like this film. It wasn't just that the subject matter didn't interest me - I am neither French nor a baby boomer so Edith Piaf has never been something that's high on my music list. Call me a culturally ignorant millennial, but c'est comme ca. I didn't like the way the story was told. It seemed random, chaotic and very incohesive. Like many other films it is told in a non-linear fashion and regularly plays around in time. 

It opens up on Edith as an adult and then cuts to her childhood and then to her as an adolescent, but whereas with other films there is a logic to this time-jumping, I failed to see any logic here. It was like the film-makers had realised at the last minute they had forgotten something important and stuffed it in anywhere they could. For example, near the end of the film we find out she has a child who died from Meningitis. We find this out in a flashback, but why was something of this magnitude not revealed until so late in the film? Not to mention all the numerous flash-forwards where we see Edith's ailing health.

And I certainly don't mean to diminish Marion Cotillard's performance. She won the Best Actress Oscar for this role - just one of six actors to win the award for a non-English speaking role - and she was good as Piaf. We bore witness to the many trials and tribulations of Piaf's life and Cotillard took us through her emotions well. And I think she embodied the character well. Reportedly she shrunk her already petite 5"6 frame to reach Piaf's diminutive 4"11 role. And I do remember reading somewhere that she worked with a dialect coach to capture Piaf's speaking voice as best as she could, although all the singing was dubbed by French singer Jil Aigrot.

Maybe this film would have been better suited to a lover of classic French music and not a philistine like me, but c'est la vie. Non, je ne regrette rien. 

Detachment review

 Number 570 on the top 1000 films of all time is the 2011 drama 'Detachment.'

Henry Barthes (Adrien Brody) is an emotionally closed-off substitute teacher who drifts from job to job. But in his latest assignment to a failing inner-city school, he forges strong connections with three young women - fellow teacher Sarah (Christina Hendricks,) a sex worker Erica (Sami Gayle) and troubled student Meredith (Betty Kaye.) These personal relationships soon have him questioning his professional detachment. 

There is no denying that there is an teaching crisis in the US. There is a shortage of 300,000 teachers with more an d more teachers leaving due to burn-out, massive class sizes and woefully inadequate funding. Covid brought a whole new set of challenges. And a lot of teachers feel unsupported by their superiors. Hell, some teachers are resorting to crowd-funding or paying for supplies out of their own pocket. It's just ridiculous.

I'm UK-based, but things are little better here. I have an SEN-teacher friend whose students come from broken families. Their parents are drunks and junkies who couldn't care less about their kids. I knew another teacher who taught over the pandemic and had virtual parents' evenings where the parents would turn up drunk or high. At school, I can attest we were little shits to our teachers with them storming out or having breakdowns on the regular. As an adult, I respect teachers so much. I could not do that job.

Detachment takes all of these issues and treats them with great sensitivity. We see everything through the eyes of substitute teacher Henry Barthes - he is a wounded man who is carrying around the trauma of seeing his mother's suicide as a child. He is also a lonely man with no family. Despite this, he refuses to give up on any of his students and encourages them all to achieve their potential. True none of them perform a full 180, but you can definitely a see a chance from the start to the end of the film.

A lot of that is down to Henry Barthes. You repeatedly tell a student he's always going to be a failure, he may start to believe you. But if you believe in them, they may believe in themselves. That's what the best teachers do. I very much enjoyed Brody as Barthes and Hendricks as Sarah. There is one particularly touching scene where she helps one struggling student with his maths work. He brought an authenticity to the character. Perhaps some of that is down to Carl Lund's script. He was a teacher so he was able to bring a lot of realism to the writing especially in how the teachers interacted and related to each other.

Many of the issues presented here seemed painfully realistic. From the unruly children to the parents blaming teachers for their children's failures - Sarah has one mother scream in her face after her daughter is expelled - to the government officials blaming the teachers for their under-achieving students. Isiah Witlock Jr had a small, but great role as government official Mr Mathis. He is there to help the school achieve its potential, but insults the teachers by implying their failings is making the whole area look bad. Very quickly the veneer slips and he quietly threatens the school principal. He reminded me of every pompous, holier-than-thou nit-picking jobsworth who only cares about money or reputation. He was thoroughly unlikeable, smarmy and malicious character.

Lucy Liu also had a small role, but she was also great as guidance counsellor Dr Parker who has a mental breakdown after trying her best to help her students, only to have them throw it back in her face.

My sister has been a teacher most of her life and she has said that teachers are expected to do so much more than the 9-5. They're expected to work in their free time and on weekends. But more than that, they're expected to be mentors and surrogate parents. That is very much what Henry Barthes is with the sex worker Erica and the troubled student Meredith. It is heavily implied that Erica is under-age and Henry takes her in and becomes a surrogate father to her. The two of them open up to each other, and with Henry's guidance, Erica starts to take more personal responsibility. Sami Gayle brought a lot of vulnerability to the role and this makes her ultimate fate all the more tragic. Feeling he is becoming too close, he calls social services to take Erica away.

But the true tragedy lies with Meredith whom Henry also becomes a surrogate father for. She is badly bullied by her classmates and has an abusive relationship with her father. Her only creative outlet is her photography which she uses to express her emotions. Henry and Meredith begin connecting more deeply until he realises that he may be crossing his own personal boundaries and he pushes her away. This ends horrifically with Meredith committing suicide. But this storyline highlights a conflict that most teachers go through. How do you stay professionally detached from somebody who is in your care? Especially somebody as young and as troubled as Meredith.

However, with so much going on in one film, it was unfortunate that some story-lines were short-changed. Henry and Sarah have a small romantic relationship, but this wasn't explored in enough detail to have truly been effective. I think this was a shame as Sarah's influence would have helped Henry reconnect with his emotions. Yet we didn't focus on this enough for it to have any major impact on his character. The film is just over an hour-and-a-half long, but I think an extra twenty or thirty minutes would have helped to round out this subplot.

But nevertheless, this was a great film that would have otherwise flown under my radar. And every respect to teachers. I tip my hat to you.

Whale Rider review

 Number 606 on the top 1000 films of all time is the New Zealand drama 'Whale Rider'.

Set in modern-day New Zealand, Whale Rider is about Kahu 'Paikea' Apirana (Keisha Castle-Hughes,) a twelve-year old Maori girl who dreams of becoming the chieftain of her tribe, despite the fierce opposition of her grandfather Koro (Rawiri Paratene) who is adamant that the chieftain should always be male. Paikea works hard to overcome these patriarchal traditions.

It was a joy watching this film. I was fortunate enough to visit New Zealand in early 2020 and even more fortunate to attend the Tamaki Maori village. This was a fantastic experience which taught me a lot about the Maori culture and Maori traditions. And it was lovely revisiting some of these memories within 'Whale Rider.' And it was also great seeing the beautiful New Zealand landscape again.

One of the things I've loved about this challenge is that I get to watch films that I would otherwise have never heard of. And Whale Rider was a film that was definitely not on my radar, but I did enjoy it. It's strange, because the film seemed to give off a very low-budget feel, despite having a budget of almost 10 million New Zealand dollars. There wasn't any explosions, CGI or special effects and the film quality never seemed that high, but maybe that's because this was filmed in 2002. Despite that, I did enjoy watching it. Keisha, in her feature film and acting debut, gave a great performance as Paikea. She was nominated for the Best Actress Oscar and deservingly so.

I feel like it's all too common for a lot of children to feel like the black sheep of their families. They feel like they don't live up to expectations or have unsupportive, strict parents. A lot of well-meaning, but misguided parents can fail to properly support their children to realise their goals. Or as in Koro's case, they do everything in their power to stop them. This could have made Paikea a bitter and resentful character, but, instead, she was empowering and inspirational. She was determined to overcome the obstacles placed before her and that determination made her very endearing to watch. After her conflict with her grandfather comes to a head, Paikea gives an emotional speech in front of her family and friends that is dedicated to Koro and the traditions of her tribe. Keisha delivered it well. And it was difficult not to feel for her.

I also enjoyed Rawiri Paratene as Koro. He provided a lot of depth to what could have been a cardboard cut-out character. Instead of being only a grumpy grandfather, Koro is just an old man desperately clinging to his traditions in an ever-changing world. It was a sensitive portrayal of how sometimes we have to abandon tradition in the favour of progress.

The only thing that I took issue with was the ending. MASSIVE SPOILER ALERT. Koro throws his rei puta (whale tooth) into the ocean and  sets a challenge for his male proteges to recover it. The winner will become the new chieftain of the tribe. After they all fail, he despairingly summons the ancient ones - a group of whales as tradition stated that the first leader of their tribe rode to land on a whale - for guidance. Paikea also summons the whales in an attempt to help. The next evening, a pod of whales beach themselves. Despite the efforts of the whole tribe, they fail to get them back into the sea.

Just when it looks like all hope is lost, Paikea mounts one of the whales and coaxes him back into the water. The rest of the whales follow suit, but instead of returning to land, Paikea rides the whale back into the open water, seemingly ready to drown. I thought this went against the key message of 'Whale Rider.' This whole film is about her becoming the first female chieftain of her tribe. She is determined to smash open the traditional patriarchy. Why would she be so ready to die like this? If she does die then all of her efforts would have been for nothing. The audience has been invested in her journey and what have they received for it? A dead heroine? Unless she was hoping to be a martyr who would go onto inspire other women, but I didn't buy that.

Of course, this drowning was just a fake out. Paikea survives and is nursed back to health. Realising the error of his ways, Koro declares her the new chieftain. So Paikea achieved her goal, but I think this was a really extreme way of doing so.

The ending was a shame, as it did spoil an otherwise really good film. But that shouldn't stop you from watching Whale Rider. I would argue that it is an underrated movie that deserves all the recognition it can get.

The Butterfly Effect review

 Number 578 on the top 1000 films of all time is the science-fiction thriller 'The Butterfly Effect.'

Evan Treborn (Ashton Kutcher) is a young man who used to have unexplained blackouts as a child. Once grown up, he's realised that he can time travel whenever he reads certain entries of his journal. He begins going back in time to right his wrongs and change not just life, but girlfriend Kayleigh's (Amy Smart,) her psychotic brother Tommy (William Lee Scott) and their friend Lenny (Elden Henson.)

Science-fiction films always have the tendency of prioritising the big philosophical themes over the characters sic 2001: a Space Odyssey. However, I would argue that the opposite happened here. The premise is interesting enough - a real life embodiment of the Butterfly Effect - the smallest of actions can have the biggest of consequences. Or as the opening line reads: "it has been said that something as small as the flutter of a butterfly's wings can ultimately cause a typhoon halfway around the world."

But this original concept was let down by its execution. It felt very much like a teen movie with a loose science-fiction premise. It didn't help you had Ashton Kutcher as the lead. He wasn't particularly bad as a dramatic actor, but he is much better known for his role as dumb teenage pretty boy Michael Kelso in the 70's show. He certainly wasn't able to shake off his teen heart-throb image here. It also didn't help that much of the film took place on a university campus. The film came out in 2005 and it sounds and looks like it did. The characters are so dated in the way they talk and dress. For a film about time travel, somewhat ironically, this film is anything but timeless.

Much of the film also took place in flashbacks showing our principle cast as children and alter teenagers. And the child actors were just not good especially Logan Lerman and John Patrick Amedori as Evan at ages seven and thirteen respectively. When the adult Evan goes back in time, he embodies his younger selves, but with his present mind. And so when they're speaking, it is actually the adult Evan speaking and the dialogue sounded awful coming out of the younger actor's mouths. Their delivery was just awkward and unnatural.

This is a shame as this did have the potential to be an interesting film. It was an entertaining enough thriller, but it very much failed as potent science-fiction.

BlacKkKlansman review

 Continuing my deviation from the top 1000 films of all time by reviewing Spike Lee's 2018 biographical crime comedy-drama 'BlacKkKlansman.'

Based on a true story and nominated for the Best film Oscar, BlackKklansman follows the story of Ron Stallworth (John David Washington.) Stallworth is the first black cop in the Colorado Springs police department. He starts to infiltrate the Ku Klux Klan led by David Duke (Topher Grace.) He is aided by his Jewish partner Philip "Flip" Zimmerman (Adam Driver) who attends Klan meetings while impersonating Ron.

Although BlacKkKlansman is set in 1970, it is as relevant now as it was back then. Race relations has always been a controversial topic in the USA especially in 2018. Spike Lee incorporated a lot of this cultural context into his film giving it a thematically powerful ending.  In 2017, in the wake of the Charleston Church Shooting, there were many movement to remove Confederate monuments from public spaces. One of these monuments was the Robert E. Lee statue in Lee Park, Charlottesville, Virginia. In response, a rally of alt-right and Neo-Nazis counter-protestors clashed with the protestors already there. This all culminated with one white supremacist driving his car into the crowd and killing activist Heather Heyer. I think that this context gives the film a special place in the cultural zeitgeist. This hatred is intrinsic within American culture. It always has been and maybe always will be.

However, I'm no cultural theorist or commentator so on with the review. I've watched quite a few films about race relations in the US from Green Book to the Help and Hidden Figures, which I am yet to review. And it's safe to say that BlacKkKlansman is far more in your face about its portrayal of racism. Rather than being subtle or understated, Lee goes straight for the throat. The KKK members are expectedly abhorrent especially the disgusting Felix Kendrickson, played brilliantly by Jasper Paakkonen. 

There is the showing of the racist film 'A Birth of a Nation,' liberal use of the N-word, numerous anti-semitic remarks, racist police accosting black activists and even the recounting of the horrific real-life lynching of Jesse Washington told by Harry Belafonte. All this made for uncomfortable but entirely necessary viewing. Lee brought the true nature of the 'black' experience to the forefront and forced us to absorb it whether we wanted to or not.

I have to also give full credit to lead actors John David Washington and Adam Driver, who was nominated for the Best Supporting Actor Oscar. They were brilliant in their roles. Ron Stallworth initially gains entry into the klan through telephone calls alone, but when it comes to going there in person, Flip assumes this role. Despite being Jewish himself and having to endure plenty of casual anti-semitism, he quickly ingratiates himself into the group. Driver definitely deserved the Best Supporting Actor nomination. 

I am reminded of Quentin Tarantino's Django Unchained. Leonardo Dicaprio was initially uncomfortable with playing such an overtly racist character, but Tarantino took him aside and said that if he doesn't 100% commit to the role audiences will hate him forever. He committed to the role and was brilliant. And so was Driver. I found him very meh in the Star Wars sequels, but he was great here. This was a far more mature and developed role and very much suited Driver's talents. Mahershala Ali might have won the Best Supporting Actor Oscar for Green Book, but Driver was just as good.

John David Washington was also great as Stallworth. He had a difficult role to play - the first black policeman in Colorado dealing with his racist colleagues while also going undercover in the clan, but he played the role of a man caught between two worlds very well. He is a black man working for the police - an institution that many of his friends and even his activist girlfriend Patrice Dumas (Laura Harrier) declares as systemically racist. 

Topher Grace and Ryan Eggold who played Colorado KKK chapter leader Walter Breachway were also great. Their more restrained but no less abhorrent racism was a nice contrast to Felix's more overt racism.

If I were to criticise the film for anything, it would be that on occasion Spike Lee chose some odd shots and some editing techniques. It was like he was trying to be all gritty and artistic, but it just came across as silly. There was the split screen at the end, where Ron was revealing his true identity to David Duke over the phone, which looked like a comic book. But the penultimate shot made me laugh out loud over how silly it looked: Ron and Patrice are investigating a strange noise outside their apartment with their guns drawn. There is a dolly shot that makes it look like the actors are floating toward the camera. It's like they're on a travelator. 

But this was a great film. Spike Lee took a challenging and provocative subject matter and put it up front for all to see. This is a film that might leave you in shocked silence or maybe it will leave you thinking. But there is no way you will  be left unaffected by BlacKkKlansman. 

Green Book review

 I'm taking a slight deviation from the top 1000 films of all time to review the 2018 Best Picture Oscar winner: 'Green Book.'

Based on a true story, Green Book follows the relationship between acclaimed, African-American pianist Dr. Don Shirley (Mahershala Ali) and his Italian-American chauffeur Tony "Lip" Vallelonga (Viggo Mortenson) as they tour around the deep South in 1960's America.

Representation and diversity are massive buzz words in today's culture. As this film is all about race relations, naturally it has received some criticism about its depiction of race. However, I think it was a great representation of race on-screen.  Rather than forcing a black character into a white role, director Peter Farrelly depicted a true story. These types of films are always so much better as they bleed authenticity. And Green Book felt scarily realistic.

Sure you could dismiss a lot of the film as exaggeration or hyperbole, but the reality was that many African-Americans faced the same Jim Crow discrimination as Dr Don Shirley did. He is not allowed to try on a suit at a tailor shop and when he goes for a drink in a bar, he is beaten by three white racists. But he is also subjected to far more insidious cases of racism. He is not allowed to eat in "white" restaurants or use "white" toilets. Despite being a brilliant musician, he is very much a performing seal brought out to be gawped and pointed at by the white people and then sent back to his cage. They're happy to have him perform, but are abhorred by the thought of eating with him.

Mahershala Ali was absolutely brilliant as Dr Shirley. He perfectly portrayed the conflicted nature of the character: a character who is caught between two worlds without fitting into either. He is too black to be white and too white to be black. Ali conveyed the true loneliness of the character - loneliness that is hiding behind a veneer of pride and standoffishness. Mahershala won the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor and deservingly so. He really is one of the most versatile actors of this generation: he can play prim and proper like in Green Book, he does suave and mysterious in House of Cards and a dark rough- around-the-edges policeman in True Detective.

But he can't take all the credit. Viggo Mortenson was also fantastic. He didn't just play Tony Lip, he embodied the character. Sure, you could say that he was a cliche who played up to every single Italian-American stereotype, but that is very much the point of the character and the point of the film. It's not just about overcoming your own prejudices and biases, but proving that you are much more than the sum of your parts. Tony Lip could have just been another hot-headed, vest-wearing Italian-American, but Mortenson turned him into a courageous man, determined to stand up for what was right - despite harbouring some initial prejudices himself.

And the film works so well because of the chemistry between Ali and Mortenson. The two of them were great together. They were like a comedy duo with Dr Shirley playing the straight man to Tony Lip's less than sophisticated ways. This clashing of cultures was hilarious to watch.

Farelly directed a brilliant film that wonderfully balanced humour and emotion while also treating listener's ears to a great soundtrack full of Motown classics, Chopin and even a composition by Dr Shirley himself. I've ran out of superlatives to describe this film. Just go watch it now. 

21 Grams review

 Number 536 on the top 1000 films of all time is Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu's psychological drama '21 Grams.'

Told in a non-linear fashion, 21 Grams follows the relationship between three different characters: Paul Rivers, (Sean Penn) a mathematics professor with a fatal heart condition, a reformed convict Jack Jordan (Benicio Del Toro) and Cristina Peck, (Naomi Watts) a recovering drug addict and housewife. After a fatal hit-and-run their lives intersect in ways they could never imagine.

The second in Inarritu's trilogy of death after Amores Perros. Similarly to what Tarantino does in Pulp Fiction, Inarritu plays around with time. The scenes don't play in chronological order which doesn't always make for the easiest of viewing. You have to work to truly follow and understand this film, but I would argue the work is worth it. Things start confusingly, but they do coalesce as the film progresses. 

We are thrown right into the action with different clips from our three central characters: Paul is on life support, Jack is giving a pep talk to another young offender and Cristina is at an NA meeting. Separate fragments that blend into a whole. Films like this can be off-putting to some viewers. It takes a lot of work to watch and understand non-linear films and this might be work that some people might not want to put in. Film is supposed to be a method of escape and how can you escape if you're constantly trying to figure out what is going on? I would argue that the similarly structured Citizen Kane is overrated. But that was because Kane himself was an uninteresting character. 

Whereas Paul, Jack and Cristina were very interesting to watch. All three were characters with troubled pasts just trying to do better. Paul is a downtrodden man distressed by his incurable heart condition, Jack is a former convict who has now found god and Cristina is recovering from her drug addition. They are all overcoming their personal demons and were easy to root for. The three lead actors did well in bringing their characters to life especially Benicio Del Toro and Watts. Both of them received Oscar nominations for their performances and rightly so.

While this film might not be for everyone, I would highly recommend giving it a go. It might end up surprising you.