Showing posts with label three. Show all posts
Showing posts with label three. Show all posts

Saturday, 3 June 2023

Three Colours: Red review

 Number 222 on the top 1000 films of all time is the French final part of the 'Three Colours trilogy: Red.'

Valentine Dussaut (Irene Jacob) is an aspiring model who accidentally runs over Rita - a German Alsatian belonging to an old, bitter ex-judge Joseph Kern (Jean-Louis Trintignant.) When Valentine tries explaining, Joseph couldn't care less, but it is revealed that he whiles away his time eavesdropping on people's phone conversations. One of these people is Valentine's neighbour Auguste (Jena-Pierre Lorit,) a trainee lawyer.

This is another film trilogy that I'm writing out of order, as is often the nature of this list. I enjoyed Three Colours: Red much more than I thought I would. I thought it would be a pseudo-intellectual arthouse film, but it was actually very interesting and thought-provoking.

Joseph Kern was an instantly engrossing character. Misanthropes are not the most original of characters, but they are engaging. He posed lots of interesting questions that I wanted answering. Why was he so callous? So lonely? Why was he listening into these conversation? And what can these conversations tell us about the human condition? That behind closed doors, the facade drops and we're not as nice as we like to think we are? Jean-Louis brought this man to life and stopped him from being a cliche.

Irene Jacob was also very good as Valentine Dussaut. In many ways, she is the audience proxy. As she is simultaneously intrigued and repulsed by Joseph's actions, so are the audience. The only character I was unsure about was Auguste whose storyline wasn't really given a chance to shine. He felt like he should have been a main character, but he was portrayed as a subplot.

Nonetheless, this was still a very interesting film. Now, I just have to go back and watch the first two parts of this trilogy.

Friday, 12 May 2023

The Next Three Days review

 Number 936 on the top 1000 films of all time is Paul Haggis' action thriller 'The Next Three Days.'

John Brennan (Russell Crowe) is a teacher whose wife Lara (Elizabeth Banks) is sentenced to life in prison for murder. He is only one who believes she is innocent and begins plotting to break her free from prison.

Paul Haggis also directed Crash. I didn't like Crash. I thought it was half-arsed and contrived. I would say the same for the Next Three Days. It doesn't just stretch my suspension of disbelief, it snaps it in half. The whole film is completely implausible.

Let's start with John Brennan who is the unlikeliest hero ever. He's a teacher. You would never believe he could stage a successful prison break. To aid him, he tracks down and consults Damon Pennington (Liam Neeson) a former convict who successfully escaped from prison. Damon Pennington helps him, because of ... reasons, before disappearing and not featuring again. John goes onto learn criminal skills like making bumper keys by watching Youtube skills. Although he has a few initial mishaps, he goes onto master these skills. This is ridiculous. You can't just master something by watching Youtube videos. It takes a lot of practice. I realise they don't have the time to show this, but they could have tried at least.

And it's unbelievable that John Brennan, a teacher who is naive enough to ask a street dealer about forging passports, and then goes onto be robbed by him, to be able to pull off a prison break. It might have been a bit more believable if Damon had physically helped him instead of offering information. I also think Russell Crowe was miscast. True his American accent was better than expected, but he wasn't believable in the role. He's an action-star who has played cops and robbers alike. He wasn't suitable as some naive teacher venturing into the world of crime.

I also thought that we were sorely missing Lara's perspective on things. One reason, I enjoyed prison drama Felon was that it focussed on the husband's life within prison and the wife's life outside of it. But this film was all John Brennan with only snippets of Lara's life. If we were going to care about her escaping, we should have seen more of her in prison. She tries to commit suicide, but we only hear about it, instead of seeing it. This scene was far more important than one of the silly, over-long musical sequences.

Also, after John breaks Lara free, he starts to be pursued by cops Lieutenant Nabulsi (Lennie James) and Sergeant Harris (Allan Steele.) Yet they only appear nearing the end of the film, as if they were an afterthought thrown in by Paul Haggis. It's very strange, as John was initially investigated by the cops who quickly dismiss him as a nutcase.

Why does Paul Haggis or his films feature on this list? Neither Crash or the Next Three Days deserves to be included in the top 1000 films of all time.

Wednesday, 10 June 2015

Review for Three and Out

SPOILER ALERT

Three and Out is a 2008 British black tragicomedy starring Mackenzie Crook (the pirate who’s always losing his eye in Pirates of the Caribbean, amongst other roles) and Colm Meaney most famous as Chief Miles O’Brien in Star Trek: The Next Generation and Deep Space Nine.  As a massive trekkie, I’ve been a big fan of Meaney in Star Trek and he is the main reason I wanted to watch this film.  I have never seen him in anything else and I was curious as to what he would be like.  This is also the first film that I’ve decided to rewatch before reviewing.  I really liked it the first time, but I felt to give it a fair review, I should rewatch it.  Whether I'll do this for other films is still yet to be seen.


Three and Out follows the story of Paul Callow, a London tube driver by day and a writer at night.  Sick to death with the noise and fast-paced life of London, he’s desperate to get away to somewhere quieter, but lacks the necessary money.  The answer to his prayers comes when after killing two people who fell under his train, his colleagues play a cruel prank on him saying that if he runs three people over with his train, TFL will pay him off with a lump sum of ten years wages, otherwise called “three and out.”  Paul falls for the prank and desperately tries to find a third person to run over, which is where Colm Meaney’s character: Tommy Cassidy comes in.  Cassidy, a down-and-out low-life drunk with an estranged family and a terminal illness wants nothing more to die on his own terms.  Paul strikes a deal with Cassidy.  Paul says that if Cassidy is willing to throw himself under his train, then he’ll try his hardest to help Cassidy amend things with his estranged wife and daughter.  Cassidy agrees, as long as Paul honours his half of the agreement.

The acting was brilliant all round.  There were a number of different scenes that were incredibly emotional and extremely touching.  Notable examples include Cassidy trying to make amends with his wife and daughter whom he abandoned eight years prior.  Cassidy’s wife, Rosemary, played wonderfully by Imelda Staunton who acts with enough subtlety and grace to truly convince the audience that she is completely fed up with her husband’s rubbish and has no desire to reconcile with him.  One of the most touching scenes is when Cassidy returns his wife’s wedding ring, which he had previously gambled away, and Staunton breaks down suitably.  The ending of the film is absolutely heart-breaking as well.  

Upon having to gotten to know Cassidy, Paul has second thoughts about the deal, yet Cassidy adamantly tells him to go through with it.  He has nothing left to live for and wants to die on his own terms.  This emotion is only exacerbated when Paul is finally told that “three and out” was just a prank.  The entire suicide sequence is to be applauded; from the moment that Cassidy steps onto the tracks, to Paul screaming “no,” to the screen fading to red.  Mackenzie Crook was brilliant in this sequence.  He perfectly conveyed the distress and frustration that his character was feeling at the time.  I got chills from the whole scene.  Mark Benton and Rhashan Stone as Paul’s prankster colleagues were great as well.

Not only does the film work as a drama, but it is also incredibly funny.  Of course, a film that engages with a subject as dark as suicide has to have some humour to stop it from becoming too morbid, but this film could leave audiences laughing for days.  There is some great physical comedy, such as Cassidy chasing Paul around town after he has realised that the latter has slept with his daughter.  The running gags are some of the of the funniest sections of ‘Three and Out.’ For example, in an attempt to find someone willing to kill themselves, Paul does everything he can think of to convince someone to throw themselves under his train, from asking an elderly man “who’s on his last legs” to considering volunteering for the Samaritans to going on suicide chatrooms and encountering Maurice, a Frenchman whose biggest dream is to be cooked and eaten by somebody else. 

In his attempts to convince Paul to do just that, Maurice becomes one of the funniest running gags throughout the film.  There are too many other examples of physical comedy to name all of them: from Cassidy trying to get his wedding ring back from a former workmate that involves the former falling through a window and the latter being accused of being a “dirty old bastard” by his wife, to Paul talking a little too loudly about wanting Cassidy to kill himself in a crowded pub.

Another plus for me is the setting.  The last few films that I’ve reviewed have been set in America, and well…I’m not sure where Ice Age is set, but it was very refreshing to see the old familiar sights of London.  As a native Londoner, I’m all too familiar with the tube, overcast weather and noise.  We truly see Paul suffering from this endless noise in a small, but well-shot sequence of all of the noise that a busy city like London can produce. And lastly, I loved the soundtrack for this film. Each piece of music fitted each scene perfectly. 

All in all, this was a great film with brilliant acting all around, especially from Crook and Meaney, an original narrative, some great gags and very little bad points.  Even Meaney’s appearance as a ghost at the film’s conclusion isn’t tacky or corny enough to bust this film down a rank or two.