SPOILER ALERT
EXPLICIT CONTENT ALERT
And so we have come to another film
that is a little different. At
university I studied and read James Joyce’s Ulysses and I was very curious to
see how a film-maker would portray the fragmented narrative and stream-of-consciousness
of the novel, so I thought I would watch this 1967 adaptation.
What’s it about? Ulysses
takes place over a single day: June the 16th 1904 and is set in
Dublin, Ireland. The two main characters
are Stephen Dedalus, a young schoolteacher who returns to Ireland upon failed
ambitions of being an artist in Paris and Leopold Bloom, a middle-aged author
and journalist. The film follows these
two men, as they travel around various places in Dublin, including Sandymount
Stand Beach, a brothel and Davy Byrne’s pub.
The good: I think the
film did well portraying the complicated and confusing literary structure and
style of Ulysses. In writing Ulysses,
Joyce parodied and emulated a number of different literary styles and
techniques. For example, chapter 3 is
narrated by Stephen Dedalus’ internal fragmented stream of consciousness, which
jumps around from topic to topic. The
film portrayed this well by having this particular scene narrated by Stephen
whose thoughts jump around as much as they do in the film, as they do in the
book. Two more examples include the last
two chapters of Ulysses. Chapter 18
where Bloom invites Dedalus into his home after the latter has drunken too much
and is narrated in the form of a religious catechism. This is portrayed well in the film, as rather
than hearing the character’s dialogue, Bloom narrates the scene in a question
and answer format. Finally, Chapter 8 is
narrated by Bloom’s wife Moly in eight sprawling sentences. The film’s final scene is narrated by Molly
in an internal monologue that is over fifteen minutes long. I also think the film did well in presenting
the novel’s fragmented narrative structure.
As the book jumps from scene to scene with little to no explanation,as
to why, so does the film.
The bad: As the
majority of the book’s action is internalised and takes place in a character’s
mind or in their dream’s or fantasies, which the film portrays, I feel it
vastly unfair to criticise Ulysses for being dull or lacking in action. However, I will criticise the film for how
much the narrative jumped around. I know
that I just praised the film for staying loyal to the book by doing this, but I
feel that if you haven’t read Ulysses and don’t know what it’s about, then the
fragmented, disjointed structure would be too confusing to follow. Hell, even I got lost at times and I’ve
studied this book for a semester. When
Ulysses was first published, there was a massive uproar over its explicit and graphic
sexual content, especially in Ireland, where it was branded as pornographic.
To my memory, there are four such incidents in the text: Bloom defecating loudly, Bloom voyeuristically and publicly masturbating over girls at Sandymount Strand Beach, Bloom fantasising about being a woman and being dominated by a mistress and a brothel and Molly, thinking in crude and explicit detail about how Blazes Boylan (her singing partner whom she is sleeping with) is a much better lover than Bloom in size, technique and stamina. Whilst the film portrayed the latter two in explicit and, in regards to the prostitution incident, quite disturbing detail, it either omitted or watered down the first two incidents, which I didn’t like. In writing these things, I think Joyce was showing how he isn’t afraid to push the boundaries of his predecessors and I don’t like how the film left these parts out.
To my memory, there are four such incidents in the text: Bloom defecating loudly, Bloom voyeuristically and publicly masturbating over girls at Sandymount Strand Beach, Bloom fantasising about being a woman and being dominated by a mistress and a brothel and Molly, thinking in crude and explicit detail about how Blazes Boylan (her singing partner whom she is sleeping with) is a much better lover than Bloom in size, technique and stamina. Whilst the film portrayed the latter two in explicit and, in regards to the prostitution incident, quite disturbing detail, it either omitted or watered down the first two incidents, which I didn’t like. In writing these things, I think Joyce was showing how he isn’t afraid to push the boundaries of his predecessors and I don’t like how the film left these parts out.
The Ugly: The
incident where Bloom is fantasising about being a woman and dominated was as
unpleasant to watch, as it is to read in the book.
Rating: Meh
Overall, I think this film is a
commendable adaption of Joyce’s work, but I would only recommend it if you’re a
Joyce aficionado, otherwise it will be very difficult to understand. Even in black and white, this film is still colourful enough to be an intriguing
watch.
As always thanks for reading and as
me old dad used to say “you can’t stop there.
I was just getting into that.”
No comments:
Post a Comment